Enel Health®Atlas
Sign in
Enel Health®Atlas
Browse libraries

Not medical advice. The Atlas is not a substitute for a clinician who can examine you.

The Pill (Combined Oral Contraceptive)

The drug that reshaped women's lives, and what it actually does

Evidence grade 5 of 5, Settled. Read how the Atlas grades evidence.

Contraceptive efficacy of the combined pill is settled science, endorsed by WHO, ACOG, RCOG, NICE and the CDC US MEC and on the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines, with roughly 0.3 percent failure at perfect use and about 9 percent at typical use in US data. The venous-thromboembolism, stroke and cancer risk-benefit profile is characterized by large meta-analyses (Dragoman 2018; Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors), so grade 5 reflects consensus on effectiveness, not an absence of risk.

Reference only. Not medical advice.

What can go wrong

The combined pill raises the risk of venous blood clots (absolute risk still low, roughly 3 to 9 per 10,000 woman-years versus about 1 to 2 in non-users, and higher with desogestrel, gestodene or drospirenone than with levonorgestrel), and it raises stroke and heart-attack risk in the presence of smoking, older age, high blood pressure, or migraine with aura, for whom it is contraindicated. Leg swelling or pain, chest pain, breathlessness, or a sudden severe or unusual headache while taking it needs urgent medical attention.

This is something to take to a clinician. The Atlas can tell you what is known about the pill (combined oral contraceptive) in general. It cannot tell you what is happening in your body, and the difference matters most for exactly the symptoms that bring people to this page.

Approved in 1960, the combined pill made reliable, woman-controlled contraception possible for the first time, and it works by using hormones to switch off ovulation.

How it works

The combined pill contains estrogen and a progestin. Its main action is to prevent ovulation by suppressing the hormonal signals that release an egg, and it also thickens cervical mucus and thins the uterine lining. No egg released means no pregnancy.

Safety in detail

The combined pill is estrogen-containing and is not suitable for everyone: it should not be used with migraine with aura, active or prior venous thromboembolism, smoking at age 35 or older, uncontrolled hypertension, or certain other conditions, per the CDC US MEC and WHO MEC. It should be started only after a medical history and blood-pressure check, and any diagnosis or new symptom warrants a qualified provider rather than self-management.

What people get wrong

  • Often saidThe pill just prevents implantation.

    ActuallyIts main action is to stop ovulation, so in most cycles no egg is released at all.

  • Often saidThe pill is dangerous for everyone.

    ActuallyFor most healthy women the risks are small and are outweighed by benefits, though it is not right for people with certain risk factors.

Who profits, and who pushes back

  • Reproductive medicine guidelines

    endorsesClinical bodies

    Regard the combined pill as safe and effective for most women when prescribed with a medical history.

  • Margaret Sanger and Katharine McCormick

    championsHistorical champions

    Funded and drove the development of an oral contraceptive to give women control over fertility.

Where the research comes from

Most of the published research on this comes from one place. 90% of it is from United States (first approved). Findings that no unrelated group has reproduced are weaker than the study count makes them look.

Share of published research by country of origin.
PlaceShare of published research
United States (first approved)90%
Europe88%
Global84%

How we got here

Efforts to prevent pregnancy are ancient, but the hormonal pill is a mid-twentieth-century invention. The birth-control campaigner Margaret Sanger set the goal and the philanthropist Katharine McCormick funded it, the biologist Gregory Pincus led the work with the reproductive physiologist Min Chueh (M.C.) Chang, and the Catholic gynecologist John Rock ran the human trials, controversially sited in Puerto Rico. The chemistry came from Mexico, where at the company Syntex the chemist Carl Djerassi and colleagues synthesized the oral progestin norethindrone from Mexican yam (Dioscorea) diosgenin, while Frank Colton at G.D. Searle made the related norethynodrel used in the first pill. Searle's Enovid was approved in the United States for menstrual disorders in 1957 and as a contraceptive on May 9, 1960; the field later shifted to lower estrogen doses and to levonorgestrel and newer progestins as risk data accumulated.

Built in the 1950s from hormone chemistry rooted partly in the Mexican yam, and championed by campaigners who wanted women to control their own fertility, the pill was approved in 1960 and quickly became one of the most consequential medications of the century.

  1. Ancient worldPlant pessaries and other fertility-control attempts
  2. 1950sPincus, Rock, and Syntex chemists develop the hormonal pill
  3. 1960United States approves the combined pill
  4. 1960s onwardWorldwide adoption reshapes women's lives

How it is understood

The pill gave women reliable control over their fertility that did not depend on a partner, which reshaped education, work, and family life across much of the world. It remains one of the most studied medications in history.

At a glance

First approved
United States, 1960
Main action
Stops ovulation
Non-contraceptive benefit
Lower ovarian and endometrial cancer risk
Main risk
Small increased risk of blood clots

What this entry does not yet cover

What follows is unfinished work on our side, not a finding about The Pill (Combined Oral Contraceptive). A short entry is not a safe entry.

  • Cost and market. We have not documented what it sells for or who sells it.
  • Supply chain. We have not mapped where it is made.
  • Who uses it. We have not documented the user groups.
  • What could change. No forward-looking summary yet.
  • How it compares. We have not set it against the alternatives.
  • Children and teenagers. We have not checked what is known about younger people.
  • What people take it for. We have not catalogued the claims made for it.

Sources