Enel Health®Atlas
Sign in
Enel Health®Atlas
Browse libraries

Not medical advice. The Atlas is not a substitute for a clinician who can examine you.

Vacuum Erection Devices

VED / penis pump

Evidence grade 3 of 5, Mixed. Read how the Atlas grades evidence.

The written rationale for this grade is still being prepared.

FDA
FDA Cleared (device)

Reference only. Not medical advice.

What can go wrong

Generally safe. Side effects include penile coldness, bruising or petechiae, a pivoting or unstable erection at the base, blocked or trapped ejaculation, and discomfort. The constriction ring must not be left on longer than ~30 minutes to avoid ischemic injury. Caution in men on anticoagulants or with bleeding disorders.

This is something to take to a clinician. The Atlas can tell you what is known about vacuum erection devices in general. It cannot tell you what is happening in your body, and the difference matters most for exactly the symptoms that bring people to this page.

A vacuum erection device uses a cylinder and pump to create negative pressure that draws blood into the corpora cavernosa, after which a constriction ring at the base maintains the erection. Effective at producing a usable erection and prominent in post-prostatectomy rehabilitation, though many men find the resulting erection less natural and report it as cumbersome for spontaneous sex.

Negative pressure in, constriction ring on, a non-drug, non-surgical option.

What people take it for

These are the reasons people give for taking it. They are not effects it has been shown to have.

  • ED of most causes
  • First-line for post-prostatectomy penile rehabilitation
  • Men avoiding drugs or surgery
  • Adjunct to other therapies

What people get wrong

  • Often saidA pump permanently enlarges the penis

    ActuallyVEDs produce only temporary engorgement. They are FDA cleared for erectile dysfunction, not for enlargement; no permanent size gain is supported.

Who profits, and who pushes back

Nobody is named here yet, because we have not done that work on this entry. Read that as unfinished. Somebody almost certainly sells this, and somebody almost certainly disputes it. Assume both until we have checked.

How we got here

Dr. Otto Lederer filed an early patent in 1917; vacuum devices were commercialized in the 1970s and later FDA cleared. Geddings Osbon popularized the modern device.

At a glance

First patent
1917 (Otto Lederer)
Commercialized
1970s
Mechanism
Negative pressure + constriction ring

What this entry does not yet cover

What follows is unfinished work on our side, not a finding about Vacuum Erection Devices. A short entry is not a safe entry.

  • Timeline. We have not built the dated record of research and regulatory events.
  • Cost and market. We have not documented what it sells for or who sells it.
  • Supply chain. We have not mapped where it is made.
  • Who uses it. We have not documented the user groups.
  • What could change. No forward-looking summary yet.
  • How it compares. We have not set it against the alternatives.
  • Children and teenagers. We have not checked what is known about younger people.
  • Where we land. We have not taken a position on this yet.

Sources

No sources recorded for this entry yet. Nothing on this page can be checked against a citation until that changes, so treat it as a summary awaiting its evidence.