Enel Health®Atlas
Sign in
Enel Health®Atlas
Browse libraries

Not medical advice. The Atlas is not a substitute for a clinician who can examine you.

Dihexa

PNB-0408 Nootropic Peptide

Evidence grade 1 of 5, Untested. Read how the Atlas grades evidence.

All evidence for dihexa itself is animal and in-vitro, from the Harding lab at Washington State University: McCoy et al. (2013) and Benoist et al. (2011, 2014) reported dendritic-spine formation and cognitive rescue in rodent models, with a widely cited claim of neurotrophic potency about seven orders of magnitude above BDNF in cell assays. Dihexa has never itself entered a human trial. Its phosphate prodrug fosgonimeton (ATH-1017), developed by Athira Pharma, did reach humans but failed to meet the primary and key secondary endpoints of the Phase 2/3 LIFT-AD Alzheimer's trial in September 2024, so the cognition claim remains unsupported in people.

Counted on the record: 0 human studies, 0 randomized trials, 0 participants, 2 animal studies, 0 lab studies.

The zeroes apply to exact-compound Dihexa human studies. Fosgonimeton and ATH-1017 are related compounds and are excluded.

FDA
Not FDA approved; dihexa itself has never been in a human trial. Its prodrug fosgonimeton (ATH-1017, Athira Pharma) reached human testing but failed the Phase 2/3 LIFT-AD Alzheimer's trial in September 2024.
WADA
Not prohibited

Reference only. Not medical advice.

What can go wrong

No human safety data for dihexa; as an HGF/c-Met potentiator it carries a theoretical pro-angiogenic and tumorigenic concern because c-Met is a validated cancer target; sold only by unregulated research-chemical suppliers.

Talk to a clinician before taking this, particularly if you have any history of cancer. The Atlas can tell you what has been studied about Dihexa. It cannot tell you how it would interact with your body, your history, or anything else you are taking, and nothing on this page is a reason to start.

A small synthetic peptide designed to mimic hepatocyte growth factor's effect on neural circuit formation. In rodent models it enhanced dendritic spine formation up to seven orders of magnitude more potently than BDNF. There is zero human clinical trial data.

Seven orders of magnitude more potent than BDNF, in mice. Human data: none.

What people take it for

These are the reasons people give for taking it. They are not effects it has been shown to have.

  • Cognitive enhancement (rodent)
  • Neuroplasticity
  • Memory-formation research

How it is supposed to work

Unlike typical nootropics that briefly nudge brain chemistry, Dihexa is designed to physically rewire the brain. It activates the HGF/c-Met pathway, a growth-and-repair system the body normally uses to respond to injury, and in doing so drives synaptogenesis, the formation of new synapses, along with the branching of neurons. The idea is structural rather than chemical: instead of a transient boost in neurotransmitters, it aims to build lasting new connections between brain cells. It is small, crosses into the brain easily, and works when taken orally.

  1. Step 1HGF/c-MetDihexa switches on a growth and repair pathway the body normally uses after injury.
  2. Step 2New synapsesIn rodents that signal builds new connections between brain cells and branches neurons.
  3. Step 3Oral and brain entryIt is small enough to cross into the brain and it works taken by mouth.

Synthetic oligopeptide derived from angiotensin IV.

Type
Angiotensin-IV-derived oligopeptide
Acts on
HGF/c-Met pathway
Effect
Synaptogenesis
Route
Oral, brain-penetrant
Human trials
None
Approved
No

Extraordinary Claims, No Human Proof

Dihexa is famous for a jaw-dropping preclinical claim: roughly seven orders of magnitude, around ten million times, more potent than BDNF at building synapses, with rodent studies showing reversed Alzheimer’s-like deficits and aged animals performing like young ones. But three honest caveats deflate the hype. First, it is entirely preclinical, with no completed human trials and no FDA approval for anything. Second, the foundational potency study sits under an expression of concern over image-integrity questions involving a co-author, so even the headline number is clouded. Third, mechanism is not outcome: building synapses in a rat hippocampus is not the same as restoring memory in a person, and tellingly, a related HGF/c-Met Alzheimer’s drug that did reach human trials failed them. On top of all that, HGF/c-Met is also a cancer pathway, so activating it raises a real theoretical concern.

How it is taken

  • Oral

    research suspension Dihexa suspended in isotonic saline for gavage. The patent does not establish a human oral product or storage stability. Rat memory experiments described in a patent.

  • Research

    dry research powder and laboratory solution Dry-stock Dihexa dissolved in DMSO for rat pharmacokinetic experiments. The patent says dry stock was stored at minus 20 C. This is a laboratory stock condition, not finished-vial, reconstitution, or consumer storage stability. Rat intravenous and intraperitoneal pharmacokinetic experiments.

  • Injection

    Recorded because this entry documents injectable use. The Atlas holds no vial, reconstitution or storage detail for it.

Safety in detail

  • Dihexa activates HGF/c-Met, a pathway that also drives tumour growth, so anyone with a cancer history should avoid it.

Children and teenagers

Dihexa is a potent, untested neuro compound with an oncogenic-pathway concern, which makes it especially inappropriate for developing brains. There is no pediatric data and no rationale for cognitive-enhancement use in minors. Any cognitive concern in a child belongs with specialists, not a gray-market research compound; there is no appropriate pediatric use.

What people get wrong

  • Often saidDihexa is a proven human nootropic

    ActuallyPublished Dihexa evidence is from rats and laboratory systems. No controlled human trial has established cognitive benefit, dosing, or safety.

  • Often saidExtreme potency in one assay means extreme clinical effectiveness

    ActuallyThe widely repeated potency comparison comes from a preclinical synapse-related assay. Assay potency cannot be converted into a human benefit claim, and the foundational record has not been clinically replicated.

Who profits, and who pushes back

Nobody is named here yet, because we have not done that work on this entry. Read that as unfinished. Somebody almost certainly sells this, and somebody almost certainly disputes it. Assume both until we have checked.

Dihexa has no approved product; its market is gray, research-chemical vendors selling it as a powerful nootropic and biohacking and longevity clinics offering it for cognition and brain repair. The marketing leans hard on the millions-times-more-potent-than-BDNF headline, while the preclinical-only status, the integrity cloud and the cancer-pathway concern stay in the background. Notably, the broader HGF approach did attract real pharmaceutical investment through a related drug, which then failed in human trials.

How we got here

Dihexa originated in Joseph Harding's laboratory at Washington State University as a metabolically stabilized analog in the angiotensin-IV / Norleual series, coded PNB-0408, and its cognition data rest entirely on that lab's rodent and in-vitro work from about 2011 to 2015. Commercialization moved to M3 Biotechnology, later renamed Athira Pharma, which did not advance dihexa itself but instead developed a phosphate prodrug, fosgonimeton (ATH-1017, converting in plasma to the active metabolite ATH-1001), to reach clinical trials. Fosgonimeton progressed through the ACT-AD Phase 2 and LIFT-AD Phase 2/3 Alzheimer's studies, the latter missing its endpoints in September 2024, while dihexa in its raw form continues to circulate through unregulated research-chemical vendors sold as not for human consumption.

Dihexa emerged from Joseph Harding’s work at Washington State University on angiotensin IV analogs, selected as the most promising for its brain penetration and oral activity. A 2013 finding that it built synapses with roughly seven orders of magnitude more potency than BDNF became its signature claim, supported by striking reversals of Alzheimer’s-like deficits in rodents. The broader HGF approach drew pharmaceutical investment through a related drug, but in 2021 the foundational potency study received an expression of concern over image integrity, and the related Alzheimer’s drug later failed in human trials. Through it all, Dihexa spread as a gray-market nootropic on the strength of its preclinical legend.

Preclinical development

2011 to 2014

The published record is a short sequence of rat and laboratory studies from the developing research group.

  1. 2011Dihexa improves performance in ratsThe study reported reversal of drug-induced memory deficits and supported the proposed HGF/c-Met pathway. No people were treated.
  2. 2013Synapse-related effects and cognitive changes are reportedRodent and laboratory experiments reported more dendritic spines and improved cognitive measures. These are not human efficacy data.
  3. 2014Synaptogenesis and long-term potentiation are studiedThe study reported stronger synapse-related measures. Human dosing, safety, and cognitive benefit remain untested.

The numbers behind the grade

Type
Ang-IV-derived oligopeptide
Action
Synaptogenesis (HGF/c-Met)
Potency claim
~10 million x BDNF (preclinical)
Human trials
None
Approved
No
Concern
Cancer pathway

The people taking it

The audience is focused on cognition: nootropic users, longevity biohackers, and people worried about cognitive decline. The draw is the potency story and the promise of structural brain repair.

Famous as possibly the most potent cognitive peptide ever described, on the strength of a millions-times-more-potent-than-BDNF claim, a biohacker legend that is nonetheless entirely preclinical and clouded.

Dihexa’s users are cognition-focused: nootropic and cognitive-optimization users chasing memory and focus, anti-aging and longevity biohackers, people worried about cognitive decline or Alzheimer’s risk, and some seeking recovery after brain injury. The appeal is the extraordinary potency story and the promise of structural brain repair, with the absence of human evidence largely overlooked.

Used gray-market as a nootropic for memory, cognition and brain repair, entirely on preclinical data. Not approved and never tested in humans.

Set against the alternatives

The defining comparison is to BDNF, the brain’s own growth factor, against which Dihexa is reportedly millions of times more potent at building synapses, a stunning figure that is nonetheless preclinical and clouded. Against traditional nootropics, Dihexa would represent a fundamentally different class, structurally rewiring circuitry rather than transiently shifting neurotransmitters, but only if the effect translates to humans. The most sobering comparison is to the related HGF-targeting Alzheimer’s drug that reached human trials and failed, a warning that the pathway’s preclinical promise has not held up clinically. And against neuro peptides like Cerebrolysin and Semax, Dihexa is the most spectacular on paper and the least human-tested. Its strength is a singular mechanism; its weakness is the total absence of human proof.

What we do not know

  • Whether the extraordinary preclinical potency translates to any human benefit, which no trial has tested.
  • What the cancer risk is of activating the HGF/c-Met pathway in people.
  • Whether the clouded foundational potency data holds up under scrutiny.
  • What a safe human dose would even be, given no safety profile exists.

What could change

Human trialsWhether Dihexa itself ever enters genuine clinical testing remains the key question.HGF/c-Met approachDampened by the related drug’s human-trial failure.Integrity resolutionWhether the clouded foundational data is upheld or retracted matters for its credibility.Persistent gray marketOngoing nootropic use despite the absence of human evidence.

The market for this

What follows describes how this is bought and sold. It is not a buying guide and it is not an endorsement of any seller.

Available only as gray-market research material, which is not for human use and carries no safety data. There is no legitimate route. Given the complete absence of human evidence and the cancer-pathway concern, it is a speculative purchase; for cognitive concerns, evidence-based approaches exist, and anyone with a cancer history should avoid it.

Gray-market Dihexa is moderately priced as a research chemical. The low cost reflects an untested compound rather than a validated therapy, and there is no quality assurance behind most material.

Synthesized overseas, predominantly in China, and sold as oral or injectable research material with no quality assurance, where a certificate of analysis is the only check and cannot substitute for the human testing the compound lacks.

China and research vendorsThe dominant source of gray-market Dihexa, sold as oral or injectable research-use-only material.No legitimate channelThere is no approved Dihexa product; the only regulated development of the pathway was a related drug that failed.Clinic and biohacking channelSome clinics and biohacking communities distribute and promote it off-label for cognition.

At a glance

Potency
7 orders > BDNF (rodent)
Target
HGF / dendritic spines
Human trials
Zero
Source
Unregulated only

What this entry does not yet cover

What follows is unfinished work on our side, not a finding about Dihexa.

Nothing outstanding on this one.

Sources

  • Dihexa is an angiotensin-IV-derived oligopeptide that binds HGF and potentiates c-Met signaling; developed by Joseph Harding's lab at Washington State University; aka PNB-0408 and N-hexanoic-Tyr-Ile-(6)aminohexanoic amide; no human trials of dihexa itself; fosgonimeton is its phosphate prodrug

    Dihexa, Wikipedia

    secondaryConfidence: highChecked 2026-07-05

  • Dihexa enhances dendritic spine formation and reverses cognitive deficits in rodent Alzheimer's-type models; reported roughly seven orders of magnitude more potent than BDNF in neurotrophic assay

    McCoy AT et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2013 (Harding lab), PubMed

    Primary studyConfidence: highChecked 2026-07-05

  • Dihexa facilitates hippocampal synaptogenesis and augments long-term potentiation, mechanistic rodent/in-vitro work from the developing lab

    Benoist CC et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2014, PubMed

    Primary studyConfidence: highChecked 2026-07-05

  • Dihexa (Norleual-family angiotensin-IV analog) reverses scopolamine-induced memory deficits and improves cognition in rat models; establishes the HGF/c-Met mechanism

    Benoist CC et al., J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011, PubMed

    Primary studyConfidence: highChecked 2026-07-05

  • Fosgonimeton (ATH-1017), the phosphate prodrug that converts to the dihexa-related active metabolite, failed to meet primary and key secondary endpoints in the Phase 2/3 LIFT-AD Alzheimer's trial reported September 2024

    STAT News, Athira Alzheimer's drug fosgonimeton fails in trial

    secondaryConfidence: highChecked 2026-07-05

  • LIFT-AD Phase 2/3 detail: once-daily subcutaneous fosgonimeton 40 mg vs placebo in 315 mild-to-moderate AD patients did not reach statistical significance on primary or secondary endpoints

    NeurologyLive, Synaptic Agent Fosgonimeton Falls Short in Phase 2/3 LIFT-AD

    secondaryConfidence: highChecked 2026-07-05

  • Fosgonimeton is a prodrug to dihexa; regulatory and trial history (ACT-AD, LIFT-AD, NCT identifiers) for the human-tested form of the chemotype

    Fosgonimeton, ALZFORUM Therapeutics database

    RegulatoryConfidence: highChecked 2026-07-05

  • Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation Cognitive Vitality review: no human clinical trials of dihexa; short rodent safety studies reported no apparent toxicity and no neoplastic induction, but c-Met's oncogenic role leaves long-term cancer risk unresolved

    Cognitive Vitality, ADDF, Dihexa profile (PDF)

    secondaryConfidence: medChecked 2026-07-05

  • c-Met is a validated oncology drug target because aberrant HGF/c-Met signaling drives tumor proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis, the basis of the theoretical pro-angiogenic and tumorigenic concern for a c-Met potentiator

    Superpower, Dihexa: An Angiotensin IV Analog and Proposed HGF/c-Met Activator

    secondaryConfidence: medChecked 2026-07-05

  • Chemical identity, CAS 1401708-83-5, PNB-0408 designation, and c-Met/HGFR activator classification for the research-chemical supply of dihexa

    MedChemExpress, Dihexa (PNB-0408) product page

    secondaryConfidence: medChecked 2026-07-05

The studies that matter

  • WSU synaptogenesis studies2013

    Reported Dihexa drove synapse formation at picomolar levels, roughly seven orders of magnitude more potent than BDNF, the origin of the famous claim, though now under an expression of concern.

  • Alzheimer’s-model reversals2010s

    In scopolamine-treated and transgenic Alzheimer’s-model rodents, Dihexa reversed cognitive deficits whether given orally, by injection or into the brain, with durable effects.

  • Aged-animal cognition2010s

    Aged rats treated with Dihexa performed cognitive tasks like young rats in preclinical testing.

  • Human clinical datanone

    No completed human trials of Dihexa exist and none are registered, so all evidence remains preclinical.

  • Related HGF drug in humans2020s

    A related HGF/c-Met-targeting Alzheimer’s drug did reach human trials and failed them, tempering enthusiasm for the approach.